To me poetry, in and of itself, is a nonentity, a great, massive nothing. What does poetry say that has not been said before? What does it focus on that has not been thought before, felt before? Even its conduit, language, is something that relies on millennia of repeated, learned, accepted meanings and notions. I do not assert that poetry is a static void, unmoving and bare. What I intend to say is that poetry, its essence, the thing that makes it work, profound, hated, loved, imitated lies not in the words, structures, tropes, sentiments, themes, but in the approach. This approach, jarring by nature and focused by mechanics (I use the word mechanics to mean the poet’s craft, skill, process, etc.), may take the form of iambs or sonnets or other physical attributes of a poem but it is not these things themselves that make poetry. What makes poetry is the view, the distance between the poet and the reader, the distance between experiences. How that distance is connoted, how that distance is framed, how it is defined, approached, and understood, makes a poem. And with the approach comes the utility.
Poetry is a tool and, as such, has its station, function, and use in a larger scheme. Because poetry is not new (not new in the sense that everything that goes into a poem has been seen, felt, understood before) the scheme in which it takes part in is just as old, if not older, than poetry itself. Matters of truth, beauty and human understanding have been debated since language existed, and, possibly before, in one’s head, before there was a spoken language. In light of this, the function of poetry must be focused, pointed, almost inherently oriented toward its goal, whatever goal that may be. There is no room for repetition, no place for prattling along an aesthetic divorced from utility. There cannot be poetry for the sake of poetry, beauty for the sake of beauty. Poetry cannot exist within itself. There is no art without ritual. Poetry must exist in the greater scheme of transplanting the truth of human understanding from the writer into the reader. The ritual is the poet observing, the art is the distance (or lack thereof) the poet creates within the approach.